Edge-AI Architecture for Real-Time Cyber-Physical System Control Using Embedded Controllers and Cloud Data Analytics

Authors

  • Deepak Srivastava Department of Computer Science & Engineering, School of Science & Technology, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, India
  • Suman Pant Department of Computer Science & Engineering, School of Science & Technology, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, India
  • Vibhor Sharma Department of Computer Science & Engineering, School of Science & Technology, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, India
  • GD Makkar School of Computer Sciences, Sardar Bhagwan Singh University, Dehradun, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63503/j.ijaimd.2026.265

Keywords:

Edge AI; Cyber-Physical Systems; Embedded Controllers; Cloud Analytics; Real-Time Control; PID Controller; Fuzzy Logic; IoT; Machine Learning at the Edge; Latency Optimisation

Abstract

The integration of embedded computing, wireless networking and cloud-scale data analytics has revolutionized how industrial and autonomous cyber-physical systems (CPS) are monitored and controlled. Currently, responsiveness, energy efficiency, and resilience to communication disruptions must be part of any competitive CPS. Conventional centralised control architectures, which transmit all sensed data to remote servers before issuing actuator commands, introduce structural lapses incompatible with the time-critical loops of processes in manufacturing automation, smart grid, autonomous vehicles and precision agriculture. A new architecture in which lightweight inference and closed-loop control run directly on embedded microcontrollers mitigates these weaknesses while reducing upstream bandwidth consumption and increasing operational redundancy. This paper proposes a layered Edge-AI architecture that enables CPS control in real time while integrating sensor acquisition and on-device signal conditioning, followed by the deployment of two competing control models, the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) and fuzzy logic, on the embedded controller node. Subsequently, telemetry forwarding is structured to support the cloud analytics backend. The performance of these two models is compared and contrasted using integral squared error (ISE), integral absolute error (IAE), root-mean-square error (RMSE) and overshoot indices. According to the comparative results, the fuzzy logic controller achieves an ISE that is 21% lower than the PID controller's and an RMSE that is 18% lower, when both controllers are subjected to a step disturbance. Both controllers maintain their local control-loop latencies below 5 ms. Consequently, this is well below the sub-10 ms budgetary requirement of Class-A CPSs. The designed architecture also includes OTA (Over-the-Air) model update pathways, enabling continuous edge inference without blocking. The results offer actionable design guidance for engineers deploying intelligent edge controllers in CPS settings with limited resources and tight latency constraints.

References

[1] E. A. Lee and S. A. Seshia, Introduction to Embedded Systems: A Cyber-Physical Systems Approach, 2nd ed. MIT Press, 2017.

[2] National Institute of Standards and Technology, Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS): Cyber-Physical Systems Overview, NIST Special Publication 1500-201, 2017.

[3] R. Rajkumar, I. Lee, L. Sha and J. Stankovic, "Cyber-physical systems: The next computing revolution," in Proc. 47th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conf. (DAC), Anaheim, CA, USA, 2010, pp. 731–736.

[4] W. Shi, J. Cao, Q. Zhang, Y. Li and L. Xu, "Edge computing: Vision and challenges," IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 637–646, Oct. 2016.

[5] P. Warden and D. Situnayake, TinyML: Machine Learning with TensorFlow Lite on Arduino and Ultra-Low-Power Microcontrollers. O'Reilly Media, 2020.

[6] K. J. Åström and T. Hägglund, Advanced PID Control. ISA–The Instrumentation, Systems and Automation Society, 2006.

[7] C. C. Lee, "Fuzzy logic in control systems: fuzzy logic controller – Part I," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 404–418, Mar./Apr. 1990.

[8] A. D. Pouliezos and G. S. Stavrakakis, Real Time Fault Monitoring of Industrial Processes. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.

[9] F. Bonomi, R. Milito, J. Zhu and S. Addepalli, "Fog computing and its role in the internet of things," in Proc. 1st ACM MCC Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing, Helsinki, Finland, 2012, pp. 13–16.

[10] W. Shi and S. Dustdar, "The promise of edge computing," IEEE Comput., vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 78–81, May 2016.

[11] International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 62443 – Industrial Automation and Control Systems (IACS) Cybersecurity, IEC Standard 62443, 2018.

[12] K. Kumar, J. Liu, Y. H. Lu and B. Bhargava, "A survey of computation offloading for mobile systems," Mobile Netw. Appl., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 129–140, 2013.

[13] Z. Zhou, X. Chen, E. Li, L. Zeng, K. Luo and J. Zhang, "Edge intelligence: Paving the last mile of artificial intelligence with edge computing," Proc. IEEE, vol. 107, no. 8, pp. 1738–1762, Aug. 2019.

[14] L. A. Zadeh, "Fuzzy sets," Inf. Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, 1965.

[15] R.-E. Precup and H. Hellendoorn, "A survey on industrial applications of fuzzy control," Comput. Ind., vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 213–226, Apr. 2011.

[16] F. Tao, H. Zhang, A. Liu and A. Y. C. Nee, "Digital twin in industry: State-of-the-art," IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 2405–2415, Apr. 2019.

[17] E. A. Mamdani and S. Assilian, "An experiment in linguistic synthesis with a fuzzy logic controller," Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 1975.

[18] Y. S. Avazov, “IoT-Based Equipment Fault Prediction Dataset,” Kaggle. [Online]. Available: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/programmer3/iot-based-equipment-fault-prediction-dataset. Accessed: Jul. 23, 2026.

Downloads

Published

10-08-2026

How to Cite

Srivastava, D., Pant, S., Sharma, V., & Makkar, G. (2026). Edge-AI Architecture for Real-Time Cyber-Physical System Control Using Embedded Controllers and Cloud Data Analytics. International Journal on Engineering Artificial Intelligence Management, Decision Support, and Policies, 3(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.63503/j.ijaimd.2026.265

Issue

Section

Research Articles