Optimization of Enhanced Pipeline Leak Detection Using Advanced Dense Hebbian Neural Network Architectures for Improved Accuracy and Efficiency

Authors

  • Amit Verma School of Computer Science, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
  • Shakun Garg Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Greater Noida Institute of technology Greater Noida, India

Keywords:

Pipeline Leak Detection, Dense Hebbian Neural Networks, Leak Localization, Real-Time Monitoring, Neural Network Optimization, Comparative Analysis

Abstract

Pipeline networks are essential in conveying water, oil, gases as well as other es sential commodities in society. These networks must be protected from compro mise to prevent losses and possible negative impacts on the environment. This paper develops an advanced pipeline leak detection procedure that is optimized by way of Dense Hebbian Neural Networks (DHNNs). The implementation of the proposed system aims at using the novel neural networks’ structure in conjunc tion with signal recognition methods for piping leakage detection and localiza tion. The high denseness of interconnection in the DHNN helps in learning and offers simplicity in computation. The method used involves pressure and flow in formation at run time, whereby deviation from the norm is established and grouped according to patterns of the pipeline network. A comparison between the developed DHNN model and a Feedforward Neural Network (FNN) model is made to compare the increased leak detection efficacy, precision, and perfor mance measures. This paper uses basic mathematical models to assess signal behavior when different leak conditions are present and simulation results show the stability of the proposed solution. The simulation uses control variables cre ated within the MATLAB environment and includes realistic numerical pipeline data. Comparing DHNN with FNN, the findings reveal better precision, faster convergence rate, and better leak localization with the use of DHNN. Experi mental results are shown in figures and graphs which provide a clear comparison of the results obtained. The outcome of this research work is expected to improve the safety of pipelines and minimize preventable economic losses because of leaks, particularly through improving leak detection with modern concepts in neural network paradigms.

References

[1]. P. Sankarasubramanian and E. N. Ganesh, “IoT based Optimal Liquid Metal Pipeline Damage Detection Using Hybrid Soft Computing Techniques,” NeuroQuantology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 773, 2022.

[2]. S. Snyder, V. Clerico, G. Cong, S. Kulkarni, C. Schuman, S. Risbud, and M. Parsa, “Transductive Spiking Graph Neural Networks for Loihi,” Proceedings of the Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI 2024, 2024, pp. 608-613.

[3]. C. Wang, W. Li, G. Xin, Y. Wang, and S. Xu, “Prediction Model of Corrosion Current Density Induced by Stray Current Based on QPSO-Driven Neural Network,” Complexity, vol. 2019, no. 1, pp. 3429816, 2019.

[4]. J. Hagenaars, F. Paredes-Vallés, and G. De Croon, “Self-supervised learning of event-based optical flow with spiking neural networks,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 34, pp. 7167-7179, 2021.

[5]. S. Cassidy, J. Georgiou, and A. G. Andreou, “Design of silicon brains in the nano-CMOS era: Spiking neurons, learning synapses and neural architecture optimization,” Neural Networks, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 4-26, 2013.

[6]. G. Mohapatra, A. Mohanty, and P. K. Tripathy, “IoT-Enabled Predictive Maintenance and Analytic Hierarchy Process Based

Prioritization of Real-Time Parameters in a Diesel Generator: An Industry 4.0 Case Study,” SN Computer Science, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 145, 2024.

[7]. Q. Sun, H. Liu, and T. Harada, “Online growing neural gas for anomaly detection in changing surveillance scenes,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 187-201, 2017.

[8]. F. E. Idachaba, “Multiple Surface Pipeline Leak Detection Using Real-Time Sensor Data Analysis,” Doctoral dissertation, The University of North Dakota, 2022.

[9]. K. Demertzis, L. Iliadis, and I. Bougoudis, “Gryphon: a semi-supervised anomaly detection system based on one-class evolving spiking neural network,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 4303-4314, 2020.

[10]. D. K. Jana, P. Bhunia, S. D. Adhikary, and B. Bej, “Optimization of effluents using artificial neural network and support vector regression in detergent industrial wastewater treatment,” Cleaner Chemical Engineering, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 100039, 2022.

[11]. J. L. Lobo, J. Del Ser, A. Bifet, and N. Kasabov, “Spiking neural networks and online learning: An overview and perspectives,” Neural Networks, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 88-100, 2020.

[12]. Q. Lv, G. Chen, Z. Yang, W. Zhong, and C. Y. C. Chen, “Meta learning with graph attention networks for low-data drug discovery,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 35, no. 1, 2023.

[13]. S. K. Qadir, “A Critical Review on the Application of Artificial Intelligence (Machine Learning) in the Oil and Gas Industry,” [14]. S. D. Vijaya Kumar, M. Lo Yin Kai, T. Arumugam, and S. Karuppanan, “A review of finite element analysis and artificial neural networks as failure pressure prediction tools for corroded pipelines,” Materials, vol. 14, no. 20, pp. 6135, 2021.

[15]. H. M. Huang, Z. Wang, T. Wang, Y. Xiao, and X. Guo, “Artificial neural networks based on memristive devices: From device to system,” Advanced Intelligent Systems, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 2000149, 2020.

[16]. S. Abdeen, M. S. M. Kasihmuddin, N. E. Zamri, G. Manoharam, M. A. Mansor, and N. Alshehri, “S-type random k satisfiability logic in discrete hopfield neural network using probability distribution: Performance optimization and analysis,” Mathematics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 984, 2023.

[17]. P. Singh, “Sorting and Path Finding Algorithm Visualizer,” International Journal on Smart & Sustainable Intelligent Computing, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 40-48, 2024.

[18]. R. Cherian, “Unleashing the Potential of Spiking Neural Networks for Epileptic Seizure Detection: A Comprehensive Review,” Neurocomputing, vol. 528, pp. 127934, 2024.

[19]. Podder, T. Fischl, and U. Bub, “Artificial intelligence applications for MEMS-based sensors and manufacturing process optimization,” Telecom, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 165-197, 2023.

[20]. Martinez-Seras, J. Del Ser, J. L. Lobo, P. Garcia-Bringas, and N. Kasabov, “A novel out-of-distribution detection approach for spiking neural networks: design, fusion, performance evaluation and explainability,” Information Fusion, vol. 100, pp. 101943, 2023.

[21]. R. Sharma, “Enhancing Industrial Automation and Safety Through Real-Time Monitoring and Control Systems,” International Journal on Smart & Sustainable Intelligent Computing, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1-20, 2024.

[22]. H. Al Yami, R. Riahi, J. Wang, and Z. Yang, “Use of Artificial Neural Networks to Enhance Container Port Safety Analysis Under Uncertainty,” in Advances in Reliability and Maintainability Methods and Engineering Applications: Essays in Honor of Professor Hong-Zhong Huang on his 60th Birthday, Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 265-291, 2023.

[23]. T. Bu, M. Li, and Z. Yu, “Training-free Conversion of Pretrained ANNs to SNNs for Low-Power and High-Performance Applications,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.03368, 2024.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-31

How to Cite

Verma, A., & Garg, S. (2025). Optimization of Enhanced Pipeline Leak Detection Using Advanced Dense Hebbian Neural Network Architectures for Improved Accuracy and Efficiency. International Journal on Engineering Artificial Intelligence Management, Decision Support, and Policies, 2(1), 55–67. Retrieved from https://submissions.adroidjournals.com/index.php/ijaimd/article/view/41

Issue

Section

Research Articles